Challenges of a Grievance‑Driven Society and Paths Forward
The illustration above is the headline from the TIME article “We Are on the Precipice of a Grievance-Based Society”, written by Richard Edelman, CEO of the global communications firm Edelman.
The following essay examines the core challenges of a grievance-driven society and reflects on how the concerns raised in the Time article might be understood and addressed.
1. The Rise of Grievance as a Social Paradigm
The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, as highlighted by Time, reveals a profound societal shift from polarization to grievance — people feeling that systems, businesses, and governments make life harder while enriching the few.
About 60% of respondents report moderate to high grievance levels, believing institutions fail them.
This grievance is deeply intertwined with economic anxiety:
- Stagnant wages
- Fears over automation and globalization
- A bleak outlook for future generations (only about a third believe the next generation will fare better)
Source: TIME
The Nordic Storyteller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
2. Deepening Distrust and Polarization
Trust in institutions is fracturing:
- Low-income groups trust institutions far less than high-income ones (48% vs 61%)
- A staggering two-thirds of people worry institutions are intentionally deceiving them
- Disinformation is rampant
- Over half of young adults support online aggression or violence to effect change
Source: TIME
3. When Businesses Become the Default Arbiter
In a vacuum of trust, business is often seen as the most capable institution — but:
- Its moral and ethical credibility is eroding, especially among the aggrieved
- Lower-income respondents view businesses as less ethical and less competent
Sources: TIME, Cooley Pubco
4. Alarming Consequences
This all leads to a toxic mixture:
- Economic insecurity
- Deep distrust
- Disinformation
- Radically confrontational attitudes
This climate threatens societal cohesion and risks normalizing aggressive activism as a legitimate tool for change.
Proposed Solutions: Rebuilding Trust and Reducing Grievance
A. Reaffirm Institutional Competence and Fairness
Governments should:
- Deliver tangible benefits: higher wages, reskilling, affordable essentials
Businesses should:
- Prioritise stakeholder well-being
- Provide living wages, transparent taxes, retraining, and environmental responsibility
Source: Cooley Pubco
B. Enhance Information Integrity
- Media must combat disinformation directly
- Collaborate with tech platforms to flag falsehoods and amplify verified reporting
- All institutions should communicate transparently, admit mistakes, and explain decisions
Source: TIME
C. Bridge the Economic Divide
- Invest in low-income communities
- Expand equitable job opportunities and local development
- Design inclusive policies that empower the next generation
- Focus on education, housing, and stable careers
Source: TIME
D. Promote Civic Engagement and Empathy
- Create dialogue between opposing viewpoints
- Encourage community service and public forums
- Cultivate empathy-driven leadership and inclusive governance
Source: Renée DiResta
E. Foster Institutional Collaboration
- Encourage joint efforts by business, government, NGOs, and media
- Co-design solutions, engage the public, and restore shared agency
Source: TIME
See business not as a universal solver, but as part of an interdependent ecosystem.
Conclusion
The Time article issues an urgent alarm:
We’re on the edge of a society shaped by grievance, distrust, and radicalization.
But these challenges are resolvable.
- Restore economic security
- Rebuild trust through transparency
- Bridge societal divides
- Promote empathetic, inclusive engagement
Bringing people back from the brink requires a shared reconstruction of trust — a collaborative, inter‑institutional effort to re-anchor society in fairness, competence, and mutual regard.